bridghamsaysnoto-a-d.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the bridghamsaysnoto-a-d.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host bridghamsaysnoto-a-d.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Webfusion Internet Solutions .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.4.33 (Unix) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

bridgham village is over 1000 years old. updated 23rd december 2016 below you will see why the residents of bridgham and surrounding villages do not want an industrial gas plant right next to them. it would mostly use purpose grown crops transported in to feed the plant 24/7 which proves taxpayer subsidy is the motivation. it would be an environmental nightmare for the surrounding villages. since the planning committee met on 7th march to decide the application for a mainly 'crop fed' ad plant there have been major developments. breckland district council planning department is contracted out to capita plc , who seem to be a law unto themselves - accountable to no-one . they appear to serve the wealthy, not the community. it seems they do this by misleading the planning committee councillors. the secretary of state is not interested, nor is the national planning casework unit or norfolk county council. it seems capita plc police themselves. judicial review is now being considered. the case officer, nick moys, works for capita plc . they do not have a good record in the public (privatised) sector. see - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/capita and - http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/apr/06/civil-servants-capita-pip-assessments-backlog etc etc etc.... (search the internet yourself) another case of capita failing to do their job properly... more than 9,000 patients' records in norfolk, suffolk and essex have gone missing since a private firm ( capita ) took on transferring files, a bbc survey shows. "not only is this debacle putting the health of their (gp's) patients at risk , it is putting added pressure on already stretched practices." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-7thnov2016 "doctors claims capita handling of gp records is chaotic mess " http://www.nationalhealthexecutive.com/health-care-news/doctors-claims-capita-handling-of-gp-records-is-chaotic-mess "gps decry capita's privatised backup services as ' shambles '. bma cites multiple failures since firm ( capita ) began 700 million contract, including problems with patient records and syringe shortages" "wrong patient records being transferred from one surgery to another. patients addresses not being updated on medical records when they move home. failure to chase up funding from nhs bodies such as health education england so surgeries can pay trainee gps, forcing practices to use their reserves to cover trainees salaries." https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/sep/14/gps-decry-capitas-privatised-backup-services-as-shambles this company is running our planning department without scrutiny. and the 'applicant' does not have a good record on waste management. "an illegal waste management operation at a farm in norfolk has led to a company and individual receiving court fines and costs totalling over 200,000." http://www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/guilty-plea-over-controlled-waste-disposal-on-norwich-farm/ it is wholly unacceptable to deposit materials such as syringes with needles, bottles of pills, batteries, metal knives and inhalers onto fields where members of the public or livestock could be affected. ian hill, environment agency the applicant's agent 'keymer cavendish' claim - 'we help our clients win every sort of planning permission.' 'our reputation is built on winning - winning planning permission, winning appeals, winning tax negotiations. not every government department and local authority likes us but they all respect us.' http://www.keymer-cavendish.co.uk/planning_regulations_uk.html it was stated at the planning meeting that national policy strongly supported this type of development. incorrect. this is contrary to government strategy. government (taxpayer) subsidies are available to encourage turning waste into energy. vast acreages will change from growing food to growing crops specifically to rot in these digesters. the councillors who voted on this were misinformed. there are already 6 ad plants in the area. it was claimed that modern ad plants don't leak. well here is one that leaked in march this year (2016) .... "seems there are further problems at crouchland biogas, w. sussex." "feisty actress julie walters has condemned a biofuel plant that spews out noxious smells and pollution close to the stars idyllic rural retreat. this week, local anger over the plant intensified when effluent from a storage lagoon on the site seeped into local streams, killing fish and forcing farmers to move their livestock . she told planning officers: the biodigester has been erected dishonestly and with cynical disregard for the local people, the environment or the outstanding beauty of the area . trees are dying around it, wildlife is drowning in its lagoons and people cant sit in their gardens for the stench. the lanes approaching it are simply not equipped to deal with this degree of heavy traffic. the operator, crouchland biogas one of whose directors is angus cameron, a cousin of the ex prime minister receives a taxpayer-funded subsidy campaigners estimate could be as much as 5 million a year ." see - dailymail.co.uk/julie-walters-war-biofuel-plant-near-rural-idyll-actress-blasts-facility-killing-wildlife-emits-stench-strong-people-t-sit-gardens see - https://tagnotowasteplant.wordpress.com/ in email to a bridgham resident on 11th march... from mike brennan operations and contract manager (planning services) ( works for capita plc )... "i must make it clear that the potentially unauthorised development at camp farm in respect of the concreted hardstanding is required to be dealt with quite separately from the application that was before the council in respect of the anaerobic digester. there is and was no evidence that this was actually the cause of local flooding and as such it could not be used as a reason to either delay or refuse the ad plant application as to do so would potentially result in a costs award against the council should the applicants have appealed the delay or a decision to refuse." below shows the planning case officer was concerned about the accuracy of the application as raised by a number of objectors. but did not inform the committee. again the councillors who voted on this were misinformed. below is communication from principal planning officer ( nick moys who works for capita ) to applicant's agent. 2 days after planning approval. read red highlighted section. from: moys, nick sent: 09 march 2016 16:12 to: 'edward keymer' subject: proposed ad plant camp farm roudham dear edward i have attached for your information a copy of the latest draft of the planning permission following consideration of the application on monday. the draft permission is largely the same as that sent previously, but now incorporates all of the conditions recommended by ncc highways. i have also made some minor amendments to the wording of condition 10 relating to feedstock and corrected some other minor typographical errors. in response to the points made previously by andrew fido, i would comment as follows: condition 3 external appearance/materials - might this be extended to allow confirmation of the dimensions and external appearance as well as materials? the dimensions and external appearance are as shown on the submitted drawings. if any revisions are proposed subsequently, this will need to be addressed through further applications for minor amendments. condition 6 noise - should this refer to the provisions set out at section 5.46 of the submitted environmental report? the general conclusions of the environmental report are accepted. however, detailed proposals for mitigation are required, to include precise details of the plant to be used (once finalised) and any necessary sound attenuation measures. condition 7 odour - paras 6.109 and 6.91 of the submitted environmental report, among others, confirm no odour impacts so we question whether a condition is necessary? the conclusion that there will be no adverse odour impacts assumes that odour control measures will be put

URL analysis for bridghamsaysnoto-a-d.co.uk

dailymail.co.uk
keymer-cavendish.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
planning.breckland.gov.uk
norfolk.gov.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "bridghamsaysnoto-a-d.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 443 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 09:55:04 12-Jul-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS bridghamsaysnoto-a-d.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME bridghamsaysnoto-a-d.co.uk

NSERVER

  NS.123-REG.CO.UK 212.67.202.2

  NS2.123-REG.CO.UK 62.138.132.21

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .